For the first time since the pandemic, more construction firms cut headcount than expanded it over the past year — and shortages of qualified workers got worse anyway. That is the central finding of the 2026 workforce survey released September 3, 2026 by the Associated General Contractors of America and the National Center for Construction Education and Research, reported by Engineering News-Record. Thirty-seven percent of respondents reduced headcount by at least 5 percent, against 34 percent that increased it by at least 5 percent. Yet 73 percent still expect to add employees over the coming year, and only 8 percent expect further reductions.
The survey drew 1,830 responses from firms of varying sizes and market sectors, conducted in July and August 2026. Key results, from ENR's coverage of the release:
"While some firms are adjusting to weaker demand, many contractors continue to compete for a limited supply of qualified workers," AGC chief economist Ken Simonson said during the media briefing. In AGC's own release, Simonson added that "the need for people to work on new data centers is keeping labor conditions tight even as demand for many other types of projects remains relatively soft," and that "the nation is not producing enough qualified workers, even as federal immigration policies are impacting nearly one-third of firms."
Data centers. About 28 percent of respondents performed data center work in the past year. Among firms reporting workforce effects from those projects, 58 percent cited greater competition for skilled workers, 49 percent cited increased wage pressure and 36 percent reported greater difficulty filling openings, per ENR. That aligns with what backlog data shows: Associated Builders and Contractors found the 12 percent of its contractors with data center work carry 11.4 months of backlog versus 7.5 months for the 88 percent without it, according to ABC's July survey.
Immigration enforcement. Twenty-nine percent of firms reported at least one direct or indirect effect over the previous six months, with wide regional variation: 42 percent in the South, 37 percent in the Northeast, 22 percent in the West and 17 percent in the Midwest. Simonson cautioned that the survey does not establish that enforcement itself caused project delays, describing evidence of that connection as anecdotal. He noted larger nonresidential projects may be able to re-sequence work if a trade is affected, but that mission-critical projects have less room: "You can't afford to lose even a day of work."
The most practically useful part of the survey concerns the first 90 days. With 83 percent of firms reporting early turnover, and the leading cited reason being a mismatch between workers' expectations and construction realities — followed by physical demands and travel or scheduling requirements — the problem has shifted from recruitment to onboarding.
"We still can't find enough, so we better figure out how to keep what we get," NCCER president and CEO Boyd Worsham said, per ENR.
ENR reported a detailed case from ACE Electric, a Valdosta, Georgia electrical contractor that netted more than 500 employees in 2026 but had to hire roughly 700 because of turnover. Human Resources Director Mindy Bates said the company now brings new hires to Valdosta for a weeklong orientation covering safety, company culture, benefits and career paths rather than sending traveling hires directly to a first project. That change, combined with better labor planning and expanded in-house development programs for field crew managers, superintendents, project managers and estimators, reduced turnover by more than 40 points over two years. "You cannot hire your way out of this situation," Bates said. "We've got to grow it from within as well."
ACE also administers written and hands-on skill assessments, and when a worker's ability falls short of what was claimed in recruiting, the company may offer a lower classification and wage rather than send the person home. Bates said 83 percent of workers offered a lower classification in the past year accepted it, though the company has not yet analyzed subsequent turnover in that group. Labor availability has also become a go/no-go criterion on pursuits: "We do have to turn down work," Bates said, most often because of the leadership required to run large hyperscale jobs.
Holder Construction senior manager Aja Gower framed the long game: "We're hopefully solving that problem five years from now because the people entering these programs today are going to be our field crew leaders in five years."
For contractors, three concrete actions follow directly from the data.
For owners and developers, the schedule implication is direct. Workforce shortages are the single most frequently cited cause of delay at 42 percent of respondents. Aggressive durations that assume full crew availability are not credible in markets with active data center or semiconductor construction. Building float into the schedule costs less than accelerating later.
For subcontractors, this is a pricing argument. When a general contractor asks for a hard bid with a compressed schedule in a labor-constrained market, the survey data is the documentation supporting a labor escalation allowance or a manpower-contingent schedule qualification.
The 2026 AGC/NCCER survey documents a labor market that is loosening and tightening at once. More firms cut headcount than added it for the first time since the pandemic, yet 87 percent still have craft openings, half say candidates lack required skills, and 42 percent had projects delayed by workforce gaps. Data center demand is pulling skilled labor away from other work. The most actionable finding is the least glamorous: 83 percent of firms lose new field employees within 90 days, mostly because the job is not what those workers expected. Contractors that solve onboarding will out-staff competitors that keep spending on recruitment alone.